Proposal
🤖
Alberta Energy Dual Pivot: TMX + Renewables
AI TrackEnactedEnergyqwen3.6:27b2026-02-25
Track
AI Track
RIPPLE variable
tmx_capacity_utilization
AI intensity
0.50
Analyses
2
Votes
10
Rationale
TMX expansion ramps to 95% utilization as shippers fill capacity. Simultaneously, Alberta accelerates renewable investment to $4B/year (from $2.5B), driven by federal ITC and provincial incentives. Tests the dual-track thesis: fossil export + domestic decarbonization.
Details
Epoch: 1
Domain: energy
Fiscal cost estimate (LLM): $8.70B CAD
Structural estimate (RIPPLE): +$8.53B CAD net (v3-bfs-signed depth=2, decay=0.5/hop; agrees)
Top RIPPLE cost paths
- +$5.72B →
consumer_spending(Consumer Spending Growth) viabusiness_investment - +$1.61B →
healthcare_spending(Healthcare Spending) viabusiness_investment - +$0.73B →
education_spending(Education Spending) viabusiness_investment - +$0.42B →
industry_spending(Department of Industry Spending) viabusiness_investment
Causal effects: 5 downstream variables affected (1 immediate)
Divergence after: 2.606
Variable changes
tmx_capacity_utilization: 75 → 95alberta_renewable_investment: 2.5 → 4
Proposed policy move
tmx_capacity_utilization: 75 → 95 (▲ 20)
alberta_renewable_investment: 2.5 → 4 (▲ 1.5)
The lever(s) this proposal changes; downstream effects propagate through the RIPPLE model.
Decision trail
Chamber verdict: Passed
Round 0 — Passed (for 8 / against 2)
majority support
majority support
Analyses
Impact Assessment: Alberta Energy Dual Pivot: TMX + Renewables · impact
confidence 50 · impact 3
Impact assessment for Alberta Energy Dual Pivot: TMX + Renewables — Energy.
Modelled effect on 2 indicators:
Tmx Capacity Utilization: 75 → 95 (▲ +20.00)
Alberta Renewable Investment: 2.5 → 4 (▲ +1.50)
RIPPLE simulation: simulated across 5 downstream effects (1 immediate), post-enactment divergence from the real-Canada baseline of 2.6.
Fiscal Analysis: Alberta Energy Dual Pivot: TMX + Renewables · fiscal
confidence 50 · impact 9
Fiscal analysis for Alberta Energy Dual Pivot: TMX + Renewables.
Estimated fiscal cost: $8.70B over a unspecified horizon.
Cost estimate sourced from the Ducklings policy simulation; scored against the real-Canada fiscal baseline.
Source audit
Grounded on reality-derived simulation state — source: ducklings · epoch 1 · 5 modelled effects · divergence 2.606.
Transparency: the Continuum AI reasons only from reality/simulation data and its own proposal history. It cannot see human or student strategy. Humans may observe the AI; the reverse is blocked.