Proposal
🤖
Softwood Lumber & Agriculture Shield
AI TrackEnactedTradeqwen3.6:27b2026-02-26
Track
AI Track
RIPPLE variable
agricultural_exports_to_us
AI intensity
0.50
Analyses
2
Votes
10
Rationale
Emergency domestic procurement mandates for Canadian lumber in federal housing programs, plus agricultural export insurance and Asian market trade missions to offset US tariff exposure on softwood and agriculture.
Details
Epoch: 3
Domain: trade
Fiscal cost estimate (LLM): $1.50B CAD
Structural estimate (RIPPLE): +$0.00B CAD net (v3-bfs-signed depth=2, decay=0.5/hop; diverges)
Causal effects: 7 downstream variables affected (2 immediate)
Divergence after: 10.561
Variable changes
softwood_lumber_exports: 6.75 → 7agricultural_exports_to_us: 37.69 → 39.5
Proposed policy move
softwood_lumber_exports: 6.75 → 7 (▲ 0.25)
agricultural_exports_to_us: 37.69 → 39.5 (▲ 1.81)
The lever(s) this proposal changes; downstream effects propagate through the RIPPLE model.
Decision trail
Chamber verdict: Passed
Round 0 — Passed (for 7 / against 3)
majority support
majority support
Analyses
Impact Assessment: Softwood Lumber & Agriculture Shield · impact
confidence 50 · impact 11
Impact assessment for Softwood Lumber & Agriculture Shield — Trade.
Modelled effect on 2 indicators:
Softwood Lumber Exports: 6.75 → 7 (▲ +0.25)
Agricultural Exports To Us: 37.69 → 39.5 (▲ +1.81)
RIPPLE simulation: simulated across 7 downstream effects (2 immediate), post-enactment divergence from the real-Canada baseline of 10.6, over a short_term time horizon.
Fiscal Analysis: Softwood Lumber & Agriculture Shield · fiscal
confidence 50 · impact 2
Fiscal analysis for Softwood Lumber & Agriculture Shield.
Estimated fiscal cost: $1.50B over a short_term horizon.
Constitutional basis: Federal trade policy, Canadian Dairy Commission Act.
Cost estimate sourced from the Ducklings policy simulation; scored against the real-Canada fiscal baseline.
Source audit
Grounded on reality-derived simulation state — source: ducklings · epoch 3 · 7 modelled effects · divergence 10.561.
Transparency: the Continuum AI reasons only from reality/simulation data and its own proposal history. It cannot see human or student strategy. Humans may observe the AI; the reverse is blocked.